Читать статья по эктеории: "A new paradigm for the model of a new economy: the role of social entrepreneurship" Страница 3

назад (Назад)скачать (Cкачать работу)

Функция "чтения" служит для ознакомления с работой. Разметка, таблицы и картинки документа могут отображаться неверно или не в полном объёме!

results on their own.organization SengulAkcar provides professional and personal support of women in Turkey to strengthen their role in the society and impact on the government with the help of five training centers in Istanbul, that are the center of generation of their own decisions and projects for the purpose to show women their alternatives and opportunities to be educated, active and to be important in a rather conservative society. Ximena Abogabir Scott from Chile brings a new way of informal education concerning environment - at that time when involvement of inhabitants of Chile is constantly decreasing. Ximena managed to unite nearly 300 organizations for carrying out investigations and identifies the needs for creation of educational stuff and conducting of workshops for the educationalists, who will expand practice and teach others in the context of peer-to-peer learning system, that expands and updates by itself.ABOUSSAB sets up a national online platform, which helps inhabitants of Lebanon very quickly and in informal way to offer ways of solving vital problems of a country, to respond to the steps taken by a government, to influence its decisions by specific suggestions. Actually, a new format of a dialogue between citizenry and officials using modern technologies, affecting the formation of full-pledged public society of Lebanon is initiated [Ceunnyx, 2014].Europe, ‘legalization’ of social entrepreneurship started more than 20 years ago. So, in 1991 the parliament of Italy passed the law concerning the activity of ‘social cooperatives’ (small and medium businesses, that are solving social problems of communities) and determined their two types: those, who provide social, educational and health services to the public (group ‘А’) and those who create opportunities for employment and social integration of vulnerable social groups (group ‘B’) [Nussens, 2006: 4-5]. Governments of Spain, Portugal, Greece, Belgium and France also legally consolidate the work of social entrepreneurship in the form of cooperatives, the main feature of which is a democratic way of government and compulsory sharing of stocks of the company between its founders, volunteers and beneficiaries. In these countries of EU social entrepreneurship operates in the form of ‘cooperatives of social solidarity’ (Portugal), ‘cooperatives of social initiatives’ (Spain), ‘companies of social goal’ (Belgium), ‘social cooperatives of community property’ (France). The Parliament of Great Britain legalized the work of social entrepreneurship (‘companies, that are working in the interests of society’ - social interest companies) in 2004, and in 2012 The Public Services (Social Value) Act [8]. The work of social entrepreneurship also legalized in Hungary, the Czech Republic, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Lithuania and Poland (The Polish parliament pass the ‘Social Cooperative’ in 2006) [Les, 2009: 21]., the main instruments of realization of one or another conception of state support of social entrepreneurship in EU are programs and strategies, that exist for almost every country at a national level: empresas de inserçâo in Portugal, enterprises d’insertion i associations intermédiaires - in France, programs of social economics in Ireland, and social enterprises in Finland. At the regional level there are such state programs as enterprises d’insertion, enterprises de formation par le travail i sociale werkplaatsen in Belgium, i empresas de insertion in Spain, that are targeted toward the development of national social entrepreneurship [Borzaga, 2008]. Subsequent state strategies of social entrepreneurship of Great Britain are considered to be successful: ‘Social entrepreneurship: strategy of success’, ‘Better business: A strategy and action plan for social enterprise in Scotland’. Their goal is to increase their role and open new markets for social enterprises, creation of integrated support of this sector, and so on [Stewart, 2011].US governmental support for social entrepreneurship comes down to: “elimination of legal administrative barriers, legislative ensuring of low interest rate loans, development of social partnership between national organizations, business and non-commercial sector”, accordance of preferences in the field of licensing and certification of social entrepreneurships in such field as social service, education, and medicine. Also those entrepreneurships are guaranteed to have an opportunity to receive a social orders from national agencies [Гришина, 2012]. In other words, there is no direct financing of social entrepreneurships in the country. Small Business Administration, that carries out a financial support of development of small business in general including social entrepreneurships partially deals with the issues in this field. Social entrepreneurships receive a mediate financial support through Department of Social Innovations that annually assign about 2 million dollars on the most promising innovative projects including social entrepreneurships [Сакоян, 2012].the last years social entrepreneurship acquired rather active development in the USA. Edward M. Kennedy Serve America Act not only expanded the opportunities of volunteering for the Americans of different age and occupational groups because of the website Serve.gov that allows searching for opportunities of volunteering domiciliary, but also created Social Innovation Fund with the total budget of 50million dollars. In 2010, its funds were distributed through an open competition among public organization that are working in the field of social entrepreneurship. By the terms of the competition every dollar ‘invested’ by the government of the USA should supplement by 3 dollars of co-financing from the organization-grantee.2010-2012 SIF allocated 137 million dollars for the projects of 197 public organizations. According to official reports, grantees declared

Интересная статья: Основы написания курсовой работы