Функция "чтения" служит для ознакомления с работой. Разметка, таблицы и картинки документа могут отображаться неверно или не в полном объёме!
P. 586. См. также: Gragl P. An Olive Branch from Strasbourg? Interpreting the European Court of Human Rights' Resurrection of Bosphorus and Reaction to Opinion 2/13 in the Avotins Case // European Constitutional Law Review. Vol. 13. 2017. No. 3. P. 551 - 567, 566 - 567. 52 Douglas-Scott S. A Tale of Two Courts: Luxembourg, Strasbourg and the Growing European Human Rights Acquis. P. 645. 53 Lehtinen E. The European Court of Justice and European Court of Human Rights: A Complex Interaction and Coexistence between the Two Courts // Workshop on the ECHR Tampere 2015. URL: https://blogs.uta.fi/ecthrworkshop/2016/03/07/lehtinen/ 54 ECtHR. Neshkov and Others v. Bulgaria. Applications nos. 36925/10, 21487/12, 72893/12, 73196/12, 77718/12 and 9717/13. Judgment of 27 January 2015. 55 ECtHR. Varga and Others v. Hungary. Application nos. 14097/12, 45135/12, 73712/12, 34001/13, 44055/13, and 64586/13. Judgment of 10 March 2015. 56 CJEU. Pal Aranyosi and Robert Caldararu v. Generalstaatsanwaltschaft Bremen [GC]. Joined Cases nos. C-404/15 and C-659/15. Judgment of 5 April 2016. 57 Krommendijk J. The Use of ECHR Case Law by the Court of Justice after Lisbon: The View of Luxembourg Insiders // Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law. Vol. 22. 2015. No. 6. P. 812 - 835, 834 - 835.
Похожие работы
Интересная статья: Быстрое написание курсовой работы